<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Caught Up on the Justification Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thejakers.com/god/get-caught-up-on-the-justification-debate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thejakers.com/god/get-caught-up-on-the-justification-debate</link>
	<description>seeing through a glass darkly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:21:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan K</title>
		<link>http://www.thejakers.com/god/get-caught-up-on-the-justification-debate/comment-page-1#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejakers.com/?p=977#comment-932</guid>
		<description>The real game changer with regards to justification is not what N.T. Wright has written but rather is Douglas Campbell&#039;s &quot;The Deliverance of God:  An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul&quot;.  If N.T. Wright steps on toes, then Campbell flat out stomps on them.  The debate between N.T. Wright and his critics seems somewhat provincial, as if they are throwing spitwads at one another.  Campbell, on the other hand, is suggesting nothing less than an entire reframing of the way that Pauline theology is undertaken.  Leave yourself plenty of time, though.  Campbell&#039;s book is over 1200 pages long!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real game changer with regards to justification is not what N.T. Wright has written but rather is Douglas Campbell&#8217;s &#8220;The Deliverance of God:  An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul&#8221;.  If N.T. Wright steps on toes, then Campbell flat out stomps on them.  The debate between N.T. Wright and his critics seems somewhat provincial, as if they are throwing spitwads at one another.  Campbell, on the other hand, is suggesting nothing less than an entire reframing of the way that Pauline theology is undertaken.  Leave yourself plenty of time, though.  Campbell&#8217;s book is over 1200 pages long!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.thejakers.com/god/get-caught-up-on-the-justification-debate/comment-page-1#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejakers.com/?p=977#comment-900</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Jared. That should be very interesting to follow. I don&#039;t believe they&#039;ve actually ever interacted in such a format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Jared. That should be very interesting to follow. I don&#8217;t believe they&#8217;ve actually ever interacted in such a format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Yaple</title>
		<link>http://www.thejakers.com/god/get-caught-up-on-the-justification-debate/comment-page-1#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Yaple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thejakers.com/?p=977#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Did you hear that the topic for this year&#039;s ETS meeting is justification, that Piper and Wright will be presenting, and that Piper and Wright will participate in a panel discussion?

http://www.etsjets.org/annual_meeting_overview

Thought I&#039;d mention it in case you hadn&#039;t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you hear that the topic for this year&#8217;s ETS meeting is justification, that Piper and Wright will be presenting, and that Piper and Wright will participate in a panel discussion?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.etsjets.org/annual_meeting_overview" rel="nofollow">http://www.etsjets.org/annual_meeting_overview</a></p>
<p>Thought I&#8217;d mention it in case you hadn&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
